For the sake of completeness, I’ve started constructing comparison tables for Acer notebooks, in order to compare basic specifications. I’ll start with an overall one, which will contain notebooks of all series, before going into series-specific tables (Yeap, I’m not going to finish it too fast since I need some feedback on the current table design).
I’ll be using Acer US configurations for these tables. However, it is likely that I will go into Acer UK data once I finish with the US configurations.
Given the rather limited fixed width design implemented on this blog, I found it rather difficult to fit in all the various columns necessary for a detailed comparison, but I hope the most important of them are there.
An example is as follows:
|
Model
|
Tech.
|
GHz
|
Display
|
Graphics
|
Memory
|
HDD
|
Optical
|
WxD (mm)
|
kg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installed
|
GB
|
RPM
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrari 3400 Series
|
|
|
Ferrari 3400 LMi
|
AMD Athlon™ 64 3000+
|
2.0
|
15.0″ SXGA+ (1400 x 1050)
|
128 MB RADEON™ 9700
|
512MB (256/256) DDR 333
|
80
|
4200 ATA
|
Integrated DVD Writer1
|
|
3
|
So, what do you guys think? Is it sufficient? Anything I need to change before finishing the rest of the tables? Go here (or check out the right sidebar) for the overall table that I’m currently working on.